home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, JUNE 28, 1993
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 91-882 LEWY, LAWRENCE E., ET AL. V. VIRGINIA DEPT. OF TAXATION
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Supreme Court of Virginia for further consideration in
-
- light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-1436 SWANSON, NORMAN, ET AL. V. NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Supreme Court of North Carolina for further
-
- consideration in light of Harper v. Virginia Department
-
- of Taxation, 509 U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-1473 SHEEHY, EDMUND, ET AL. V. MT DEPT. OF REVENUE
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Supreme Court of Montana for further consideration in
-
- light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-1697 BASS, FRANCIS, ET AL. V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Tax Section, South Carolina Bar, for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The
-
- judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Supreme Court of South Carolina for further
-
- consideration in light of Harper v. Virginia Department
-
- of Taxation, 509 U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-1913 OHIO V. DeMUTH, KEVIN
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Court of Appeals of Ohio, Lucas County, for further
-
- consideration in light of United States v. Dixon, 509 U.
-
- S. (1993).
-
- 91-1924 AYUDA, INC., ET AL. V. RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of
-
- Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of
-
- Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc., 509 U. S.
-
- (1993).
-
- 91-2047 NORWEST BANK, ETC., ET AL. V. McCLUNG, DOROTHY, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Supreme Court of Minnesota for further consideration in
-
- light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-6745 RICHARDSON, MIGUEL A. V. TEXAS
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for
-
- further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-8105 EARHART, JAMES O. V. TEXAS
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for
-
- further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-8435 GRANVIEL, KENNETH V. TEXAS
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for
-
- further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-335 ALABAMA V. LEIGHTON, RICHARD COLE
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama for further
-
- consideration in light of United States v. Dixon, 509 U.
-
- S. (1993).
-
- 92-451 RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL L V. PERALES, CESAR A., ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of Reno v. Catholic
-
- Social Services, Inc., 509 U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-521 DUFFY, EUGENE H., ET AL. V. WETZLER, JAMES W., ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second
-
- Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of
-
- Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509 U. S.
-
- (1993).
-
- 92-528 SALE, ACTING COMMR., INS V. HAITIAN CENTERS COUNCIL
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals
-
- for the Second Circuit is vacated as moot. See United
-
- States v. Munsingwear, 340 U. S. 36, 39-40 (1950);
-
- University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U. S. 390 (1981).
-
- 92-773 RENO, ATTY. GENERAL V. ADULT VIDEO ASSN., ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Alexander v. United
-
- States, 509 U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-849 INS, ET AL. V. ZAMBRANO, MARTA, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Reno v. Catholic
-
- Social Services, Inc., 509 U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-1276 REICH, CHARLES V. COLLINS, MARCUS, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Supreme Court of Georgia for further consideration in
-
- light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-1522 AM. NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. V. HANSON, H. C., ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Supreme Court of Kentucky for further consideration in
-
- light of TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources
-
- Corp., 509 U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-5580 LUCAS, HENRY L. V. TEXAS
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for
-
- further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-7433 HALE, ALVIE J. V. U.S. DOJ, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the
-
- Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of
-
- United States Department of Justice v. Landano, 508 U.
-
- S. (1993).
-
- 92-7567 HAWKINS, SAMUEL V. TEXAS
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for
-
- further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509
-
- U. S. (1993).
-
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
-
- No. IN THE MATTER OF HAYDEN F. BURGESS FOR ADMISSION TO THE
- BAR OF THIS COURT
-
- The motion for reconsideration of the denial
-
- of admission to the Bar of this Court is denied.
-
- No. IN THE MATTER OF CLARK O. BREWSTER FOR ADMISSION TO THE
- BAR OF THIS COURT
-
- The motion for further consideration of the
-
- application for admission to the Bar of this Court
-
- is denied.
-
- No. EMMETT K. TROYER AND CAROL L. TROYER V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.
-
-
-
- A-909 EDWARD LEWIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- The application for stay addressed to Justice
-
- Blackmun and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- D-1236 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANLEY EDWARD PROTOKOWICZ, J
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Stanley
-
- Edward Protokowicz, Jr., of Bel Air, Maryland, has been
-
- suspended from the practice of law by the Court of
-
- Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of February
-
- 22, 1993, having suspended the said Stanley Edward
-
- Protokowicz, Jr., from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Stanley Edward
-
- Protokowicz, Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that his name be stricken from the
-
- roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of
-
- this Court.
-
- D-1248 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JANICE MARIE HAYES
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Janice
-
- Marie Hayes, of Las Vegas, Nevada, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Nevada
-
- and this Court by order of March 22, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Janice Marie Hayes from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring her to show cause why she should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Janice Marie Hayes be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- 109, Orig. OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO
-
- The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief
-
- in this case expressing the views of the United States
-
- on the Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Judgment
-
- and Decree.
-
- 91-1950 AMERICAN DREDGING CO. V. MILLER, WILLIAM R.
-
- The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument is granted.
-
- 92-519 JOHNSON, BOLLEY, ET AL. V. DE GRANDY, MIGUEL, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights
-
- Under Law for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
-
- granted.
-
- 92-989 TENNESSEE V. MIDDLEBROOKS, DONALD
-
- The motion of Appellate Committee of the California
-
- District Attorneys' Association for leave to file a
-
- brief as amicus curiae is granted.
-
- 92-1012 SIMPSON PAPER (VT) CO. V. DEPT OF ENVTL CONSERV, ET AL
-
- The motion of respondent Vermont to strike the
-
- supplement is denied.
-
- 92-1482 WEISS, ERIC V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing
-
- the joint appendix is granted.
-
- 92-1510 CAVANAUGH, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. ROLLER, GARY LEE
-
- The motion for appointment of counsel is granted
-
- and it is ordered that W. Gaston Fairey, Esquire, of
-
- Columbia, South Carolina, is appointed to serve as
-
- counsel for the respondent in this case.
-
- 92-1971 MOORE, JACKIE, ET AL. V. ESPY, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
- (A-927)
- The application for stay addressed to Justice
-
- Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- 92-6921 LITEKY, JOHN PATRICK, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion for appointment of counsel is granted
-
- and it is ordered that Peter Thompson, Esquire, of
-
- Minneapolis, Minnesota, is appointed to serve as counsel
-
- for the petitioners in this case.
-
- 92-7549 SCHIRO, THOMAS V. CLARK, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner to enlarge the record is
-
- granted.
-
- 92-8643 QURESHI, MASHUQ AHMAD V. ALEXANDRIA HOSPITAL, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- July 19, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 92-1479 McDERMOTT, INC. V. AmCLYDE, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted
-
- limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
-
- 92-1662 UNITED STATES V. GRANDERSON, RALPH STUART
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is granted.
-
- 92-8579 ELDER, CHARLES K. V. HOLLOWAY, R. D., ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 91-375 PLEDGER, JAMES, ET AL. V. BOSNICK, STANLEY, ET AL.
-
- 91-1131 ) WINTHERTHUR REINSURANCE V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
- )
- 91-1146 ) UNIONAMERICA INS., ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
-
- 91-5862 BOGGESS, CLIFFORD H. V. TEXAS
-
- 91-7399 JACKSON, JIMMY V. TEXAS
-
- 91-7669 WILKERSON, RICHARD J. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 91-8433 GOSCH, LESLEY L. V. TEXAS
-
- 91-8516 GOSS, CORNELIUS A. V. TEXAS
-
- 91-8742 JAMES, JOHNNY V. TEXAS
-
- 91-8768 FULLER, TYRONE L. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-844 OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS V. ADAMS, LEONARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-1366 DeCAMP, JOHN V. DOUGLAS CTY., ETC., ET AL.
-
- 92-1376 NICKERSON AM. PLANT BREEDERS V. LATHAM SEED CO., ET AL.
-
- 92-1453 COLLINS, MARCUS, ET AL. V. REICH, CHARLES J.
-
- 92-1471 ) CELOTEX CORPORATION V. POOL, REUBEN, ET AL.
- )
- 92-1474 ) FIBREBOARD CORPORATION V. POOL, REUBEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-1505 COLLAGEN CORPORATION V. KENNEDY, CHARLOTTE, ET AL.
-
- 92-1508 WOODARD, LEE, ET AL. V. SEGHETTI, RALPH, ET AL.
-
- 92-1708 NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL INS. CO. V. DEFENDER INDUS., ET AL.
-
- 92-1746 BOSTIC, RAY V. CHICAGO, ET AL.
-
- 92-1754 JACOBSON, MICHAEL V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-1755 LAMBORNE, DONALD V. HAYNES, BRADLEY, ET AL.
-
- 92-1756 SEVER, THOMAS, ET AL. V. FELICE, THOMAS
-
- 92-1760 DeCOSTA, DAVID, ETC. V. VIACOM INTERNATIONAL
-
- 92-1763 VALENTINE SUGARS INC. V. DONAU CORP., ET AL.
-
- 92-1765 CULLEN, MARK V. HOUSING AUTH, SACRAMENTO CTY
-
- 92-1773 WALKER, THELMA V. WINDOM, STEPHEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-1775 ) RAWL SALES, ETC. V. TRUSTEES, UMWA 1974, ET AL.
- )
- 92-1945 ) PITTSTON COMPANY, ET AL. V. UNITED MINE WORKERS, ET AL.
-
- 92-1776 JOHNSON, MOSSIE V. LYNCH, DENNIS, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 92-1779 CARTER, J. MATTHEW, ET AL. V. ST. LOUIS, ET AL.
-
- 92-1780 GEICK, EDWARD V. KAY, JAMES, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 92-1781 CASEY, FRANKLIN, ET AL. V. NationsBANK OF TEXAS, ET AL.
-
- 92-1785 IHC HOSPITALS, INC., ET AL. V. DECKER, JOSEPH
-
- 92-1787 NEWMAN, ROBERT V. VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR OF OHIO
-
- 92-1792 HELINSKI, RONALD V. ROSENBERG, LEON
-
- 92-1796 SANDERS, DORSEY V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-1800 LEWIS, SCOTT, ET UX. V. BABCOCK INDUSTRIES, ET AL.
-
- 92-1811 McCULLOM, GREGORY V. PRINCETON BD. OF ED., ET AL.
-
- 92-1815 HEFTI, CHARLES, ET UX. V. McGRATH, KEVIN, ET AL.
-
- 92-1816 GREER, EDWARD, ET UX. V. GASTON, ARTHUR
-
- 92-1853 RANGE, LITHO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1858 SIMPSON, JANET, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1859 KRAWSHUK, GEORGE V. HOUSTON, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 92-1875 ) PARDUE, JACK V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-8724 ) PARDUE, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-8771 ) PARDUE, MICHEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1876 UNDERWOOD, JAMES H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5088 HOLLAND, DAVID L. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-5153 JOINER, ORIEN C. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-5182 KELLY, CARL E. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-5841 BRIDGE, WARREN E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-5846 HARRIS, DANNY R. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-5865 DREW, ROBERT N. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6035 DRAUGHON, MARTIN A. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-6394 CANTU, RUBEN MONTOYA V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6439 CLARK, WILLIE EARL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6942 NEWTON, FRANCES ELAINE V. TEXAS
-
- 92-6953 DUNN, KENNETH V. TEXAS
-
- 92-7120 CANTU, DOMINGO V. TEXAS
-
- 92-7213 BONHAM, ANTONIO N. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-7360 SALDIVAR-GONZALEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7499 JARVIS, DOUGLAS A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7530 JACOBS, JESSE D. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-7919 BLUE, MICHAEL LYNN V. TEXAS
-
- 92-7972 RABBANI, SYED MOHMED V. TEXAS
-
- 92-7979 HAMPEL, NATALYA T., ET VIR V. AUTORIDAD DE ENERGIA, ETC.
-
- 92-8191 FUNKHOUSER, DENNIS S. V. SAFFLE, REGIONAL DIR., ET AL
-
- 92-8212 HUNTER, BERT L. V. MISSOURI
-
- 92-8318 HARRELL, NATHANIEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8323 JAMES, ARTHUR T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8344 COOKS, VINCENT EDWARD V. TEXAS
-
- 92-8412 LEE, RALPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8455 NANTZ, DONALD WAYNE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8513 SANCHEZ, ENRIQUE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-8514 SAPP, HORACE V. BRADY, THOMAS
-
- 92-8516 HERNANDEZ, HENRY D. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-8518 GOTCHEY, WILLIAM S. V. SEC
-
- 92-8520 HOWE, DIANE J. V. MICHIGAN
-
- 92-8521 FARMELANT, ANNABELLE V. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
-
- 92-8535 MITCHELL, JAMES V. IRVIN, SUPT., WENDE CORR.
-
- 92-8538 LEWIS, CHARLES E. V. LYNN, BRUCE N., ET AL.
-
- 92-8540 RODGERS, EDWARD D. V. TRIGG, SUPT.,IN YOUTH CENTER
-
- 92-8543 KLEINSCHMIDT, WILLIAM E. V. U.S. FIDELITY, ET AL.
-
- 92-8545 JENKINS, COLIN, ET AL. V. UTAH
-
- 92-8552 TAGGART, ARTHUR V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-8555 SLUSHER, FLOYD DAVID V. COLORADO
-
- 92-8564 PALMER, GARY SKIPPER V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-8572 BROWNE, ANTHONY V. IOWA
-
- 92-8573 ENDRES, ROBERT L. V. DELO, SUPT.
-
- 92-8574 FAIRCHILD, BARRY L. V. ENDELL, DIR., AR DOC
-
- 92-8575 JONES, CHARLES W. V. ST. PAUL, MN, ET AL.
-
- 92-8577 HINES, LARRY D. V. BORG, WARDEN
-
- 92-8580 HUNT, EANOS E. V. MILLS, WARDEN
-
- 92-8584 JEFFERS, LEROY R. V. CLARK, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-8585 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH V. FREEMAN, DAVID, ET AL.
-
- 92-8586 SNYDER, FRANK V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-8589 WEST, BRENDA KAY V. TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER
-
- 92-8596 JAMES, CARL V. IVINS, GREGG, ET AL.
-
- 92-8607 STEEL, JOHN V. STEEL, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 92-8612 HILLESHIEM, BECKI A. V. WISCONSIN
-
- 92-8619 PARKER, JOHN V. ALABAMA
-
- 92-8627 LEWIS, CHARLES E. V. LYNN, SEC., LA DOC, ET AL.
-
- 92-8628 MITCHELL, RONALD B. V. OHIO
-
- 92-8636 JASINSKI, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8640 O'BRIEN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8642 PANADERO, K'MARYAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8644 McCLAIN, CARLTON V. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY
-
- 92-8647 LEON, TIMOTHY J. V. CARROLL, WARDEN
-
- 92-8650 WASHINGTON, TODD V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-8659 BASS, HOWARD S. V. BASS, DEBORAH
-
- 92-8663 HUNT, MICHAEL A. V. VASQUEZ, WARDEN
-
- 92-8664 IVY, ARTHUR V. MERIDIAN, MS, ET AL.
-
- 92-8668 CAMACHO, GENARO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8674 MASSENGILL, MARSHALL E. V. DORSEY, WARDEN
-
- 92-8675 NOBLE, DAVID V. JOHNSON, RANDALL
-
- 92-8676 MILLER, CARL F. V. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS
-
- 92-8677 McCOY, ROBERT EARL V. LOCKHART, DIR., AR DOC
-
- 92-8681 RICHEY, SHANE P. V. YARBOROUGH, WARDEN
-
- 92-8684 GARCIA, DAVID MONTIEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8695 COX, ROBERT B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8698 MUINA, JOSH V. KKK ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA
-
- 92-8714 MAXWELL, GEORGE V. CONNECTICUT
-
- 92-8718 CRAIG, BRYAN LANG V. BURTON, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-8720 CRONEY, BARBREE V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 92-8750 CHIA, SAMUEL G. V. BABBITT, SEC. OF INTERIOR
-
- 92-8768 MILTON, HUBERT EARL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8790 WARMSLEY, LANDON V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-8813 SIMMONS, ROBERT LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8815 EDNEY, WARREN L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8816 SPIVEY, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8818 VONGSAY, TODD LINH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8819 SALAZAR, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8820 JOHNSON, HUEY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8824 GRANDERSON, RALPH S. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8826 COOK, JUDITH K. V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-8829 THOMPSON, ANDRE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8830 TRAINER, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8833 SALCIDO, JULIO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8837 MONTGOMERY, DANIEL LYNN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8838 WHITE, ROBERT GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8839 RUNNELLS, WILLIAM ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8840 MEDINA, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8842 ROMON, ANDES MARGARITO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8844 PICART, AUREA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8848 DIAMOND, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8852 HATHORN, GENE W. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-8854 CURE, JAMES B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8858 ARIAS, HERNANDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8859 ROQUEMORE, JOHN KEITH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8868 SAN-MIGUEL, MICHAEL PEREZ V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8880 ROCCIO, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8881 RYMAN, JOHN MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8882 LADY, DONALD KENNETH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8885 HOSTEN, WILLIE C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8898 DENNIS, DERRICK RENARDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8900 RAMSEY, JOHN HENRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8901 LOVE, LEON D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8913 HEARN, JERRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 92-361 SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS V. GUTIERREZ, JOEY V.
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-1241 OWENS-IL, INC. V. POOL, REUBEN, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Continental Casualty Company for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
- 92-8937 IN RE JOSEPH ZIEGLER
-
- The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
-
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
- 92-8587 IN RE MICHAEL VIGIL
-
- 92-8599 IN RE GEORGE I. BENNY
-
- 92-8649 IN RE ROY A. DAY
-
- 92-8710 IN RE PHILIP R. ANDERSON
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
- 92-8472 IN RE EILEEN VEY
-
- 92-8473 IN RE EILEEN VEY
-
- 92-8646 IN RE JOHN O'LEARY
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus and/or
-
- prohibition are denied.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
-
- 91-1030 WITHROW, PAMELA V. WILLIAMS, ROBERT
-
- 92-259 OK TAX COMMN. V. SAC & FOX NATION
-
- 92-1512 MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT CO. V. INTL. UNION, UN. AUTO., ETC.
-
- 92-1551 IN RE JESSIE McDONALD
-
- 92-1565 SELTZER, RICHARD V. OPM
-
- 92-1724 DiNOLA, EMILIA V. STEWART, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 92-7249 HOLLY, WILLIAM V. TRUE, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-7893 BEAUMONT, JIMMY, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7955 VEY, EILEEN V. WOLFE, ATTORNEY GEN. OF PA
-
- 92-7958 HUGHES, HOWARD V. BORGERT, WARDEN
-
- 92-7974 MIX, JAMES RILEY V. CITY OF HAZEL PARK, ET AL.
-
- 92-8009 MORRISON, CURTIS LEE V. ESTELLE, WARDEN
-
- 92-8092 RAPHLAH, RAPHAEL V. TEXAS
-
- 92-8103 IN RE DAVID G. HARRIS
-
- 92-8107 WATTS, GARY V. MAZURKIEWICZ, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-8259 DEMPSEY, JOHN V. HARSHBARGER, MA AG
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
-
- ORDER
-
- Pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.
-
- Section 42, it is ordered that Justice Thomas be, and
-
- he is hereby, assigned to the Tenth Circuit as Circuit
-
- Justice pending further order of the Court.
-
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from today until
-
- the first Monday in October, 1993 at which time the
-
- October 1992 Term will adjourn.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the
-
- following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-